The unexpected departure of Pat Gelsinger, CEO of Intel (INTC.US), has opened a window of opportunity for the beleaguered tech giant to reconsider potential transactional avenues that Gelsinger previously dismissed during his tenure. This major shift in leadership has not only marked a pivotal moment for the company but also ignited conversations around a myriad of strategic options including possible mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures that could allow Intel to regain its footing in a competitive market defined by a rapid evolution of technology.

Intel's board of directors had reportedly been exploring a variety of possibilities in recent months, from private equity transactions to the contentious idea of splitting the company’s foundry and design segments. Under Gelsinger's leadership, there was a firm commitment to restoring the company's technological edge rather than entertaining a split. However, with his exit, analysts believe a window of opportunity has emerged for new talks on these previously off-limits subjects.

According to Bloomberg Intelligence analysts Kunjan Sobhani and Oscar Hernandez Tejada, the change at the helm of Intel enhances the potential for asset divestiture. They remarked, "The leadership change at Intel increases the possibilities for spin-offs. Gelsinger was firmly opposed to splitting the company, but the long and costly transformation plan is testing shareholder patience, potentially forcing Intel to reconsider." The atmosphere within Intel is undoubtedly charged with anticipation as stakeholders eye these potential shifts.

Advertisement

Intel's disappointing earnings report released in early August exposed the myriad challenges the company faces as it endeavors to pivot amid fierce competition in the era of artificial intelligence. A significant board meeting held in September saw the company weigh various strategies, including the structure of splitting the organization. However, the company has since shifted gears towards less drastic transformations; this includes pausing construction projects in Poland and Germany, and laying off approximately 15,000 employees. Furthermore, Intel's suspension of its dividend, a practice that dates back to 1992, signals an urgent focus on conserving cash to realign with its transformation roadmap.

Should Intel's new CEO steer the company towards deeper restructuring, several notable scenarios could emerge. One such potential avenue lies in the separation of the chip foundry and design departments. Throughout Gelsinger's leadership, Intel made strides to enhance its foundry business to compete with industry heavyweight TSMC (TSM.US). Yet, this plan has been fraught with difficulties—Intel has not only lagged behind in the sophisticated chip manufacturing race, but also struggled with an insufficient capacity which makes profitability elusive for its foundry services. The foundry sector has faced significant losses since the beginning of the year, presenting a case for reconsideration.

Finding a buyer for Intel's design department could also be feasible, but the foundry segment may pose challenges as it is often viewed as a "hot potato." The largest chip foundry in America, GlobalFoundries (GFS.US), finds itself in a precarious position, strained by its own financing troubles and lacking the necessary experience in the advanced chip manufacturing sector Intel is targeting. Additionally, uncertainty looms over whether Intel's new leadership or board members would be inclined to sever ties in a company that was once the epitome of dominance in the semiconductor sphere. Furthermore, any move to split could complicate Intel's eligibility for the $7.9 billion federal funding under the CHIPS and Science Act.

Another scenario involves attracting potential buyers, such as Qualcomm (QCOM.US), which had previously shown interest in Intel. However, more recent remarks have indicated that Qualcomm’s enthusiasm for acquiring Intel as a whole has reportedly cooled, mainly due to the complexity involved in such an acquisition. Sources have indicated that Qualcomm may now pivot to target Intel's individual business units or rekindle interest later. This aligns with Qualcomm's business model, wherein they do not fabricate chips themselves but rely on partners like TSMC, making Intel’s foundry operations less appealing.

Broadcom (AVGO.US) is another contender that had considered a bid for Intel but chose not to advance negotiations. Any major chip company's merger would face regulatory scrutiny worldwide, a challenge both Qualcomm and Broadcom are well aware of.

Additionally, the concept of divesting Altera, Intel’s programmable chip division, is also worth exploring. Acquired in 2015, Altera has faced headwinds amidst declining telecom spending. Reports suggest that Intel's management has expressed a need for Altera to produce cutting-edge chips to regain lost market share, which may prompt the search for buyers such as Francisco Partners, Bain Capital, and Silver Lake Management, who have shown interest in investing in Altera. Recently, Lattice Semiconductor Corp. was reported to be considering acquiring Altera entirely, collaborating with advisors and seeking private equity support for potential bids.

Regardless of the trajectory these discussions take, the possibility of divesting Altera under new leadership could gain further momentum. In a related development, a proposal from Apollo Global Management (APO.US) surfaced in September, with an offer to inject billions into Intel, potentially amounting to as much as $5 billion in equity investments. Their established relationship with Intel has solidified further; notably, in June, Intel agreed to divest its stake in a joint venture in Ireland to Apollo for $11 billion, indicative of Apollo’s willingness to provide external capital, further pressuring Intel’s transformation efforts.

Lastly, there lies the consideration of transactions concerning Mobileye, the self-driving technology firm Intel acquired in 2017. Despite going public in 2022, Intel still retains a majority share in Mobileye. Although the company stated in September that it does not currently plan to divest its majority stake in Mobileye, this could change with the influence of new leadership. Reports suggest that Intel may choose to sell a portion of its shares in Mobileye on the open market or directly to a single buyer. However, the unfortunate reality is that this investment might not yield favorable returns, given that Intel shelled out approximately $15 billion for Mobileye while the latter's current market cap hovers around $14.1 billion.

In conclusion, the departure of Pat Gelsinger as CEO of Intel lays the groundwork for a pivotal moment in the company’s history. As new leadership steps forward, the potential for significant restructuring, asset divestiture, and strategic acquisitions are poised to redefine Intel's path in a rapidly shifting technological landscape. The choices made in the coming months will be crucial not only for the company’s recovery from its current challenges but also for its long-term viability in the semiconductor industry.